Who lands on the page
Five readers, 25 to 80, built to the older end. Sixteen live doctor pages read off the DOM to find what everyone else does, so we could do the other thing.
who worked on it
the chain · what each hand read, decided and wrote
One competitor measured with the same instrument that will later measure ours.
So the comparison at the end is not a matter of opinion. 16 mechanics transferable, 17 identity markers forbidden, because two doctors at one hospital cannot share the most recognisable thing about a page.site/01_RESEARCH/REFERENCES.md11 sep 17:47site/01_RESEARCH/REFERENCES.md11 sep 17:47Gate 1 measured type scale, easing and shadow tint, and never recorded that the doctor is the one SPEAKING.
That omission is what let three rewrites chase depth when the fault was the person.site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25Every quote read off the live DOM. Five dead domains named rather than reconstructed.
Screenshots record what a page looks like and never what it does.site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25Shab is 1 of 16. Everyone else writes about themselves in the third person.
A man speaking as himself is the cheapest differentiation available and it costs nothing to build.site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.md12 sep 23:01site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25Peer proof ranks LAST of nine claim types on a first screen.
And v4 had five PubMed ids at its centre.site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.md12 sep 23:01site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25Zero of sixteen print one.
The weakest page in the whole corpus opens on What is Interventional Radiology, which is v4 almost word for word.site/01_RESEARCH/AUDIENCE.md11 sep 17:48site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md12 sep 09:25Five avatars, each with the question they arrive with and the one they will not type.
The prostate reader's decider is not question one, it is the fourth: his friend said nothing came out afterwards, and he has repeated that to nobody.site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.md12 sep 23:0125 to 80, and every consequence written as a number.
A 74 year old decides the type scale, not the 34 year old.site/01_RESEARCH/AUDIENCE.md11 sep 17:48The door against the room. Three of five readers are NOT the patient.
A daughter has to be able to send her father a link that opens on his condition.site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.md12 sep 23:01site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.md12 sep 23:01changed sinceEvery trust question mapped to a real asset, and the ones with no asset flagged MISSING.
A question is never answered with a reassurance. If nothing on disk answers it, that is a hole, not a copy problem.site/02_STRUCTURE/QUESTION_ASSET_MAP.md12 sep 18:09site/02_STRUCTURE/QUESTION_ASSET_MAP.md12 sep 18:09Questions answered on the surface over questions ranked, weighted by rank. Under 80 it goes back.
A brief written forwards optimises for being correct. A brief written backwards optimises for being believed.site/02_STRUCTURE/QUESTION_ASSET_MAP.md12 sep 18:09A real patient count, and a price sentence.
Both are research's ask of him, and the second is the top commercial query in all five conditions.No moodboard of doctor sites.
Screenshots record what a page looks like and never what it does.rendered out of
site/02_STRUCTURE/AVATARS.mdfive readers, the honesty rule, door vs room · 12 sep 23:01site/01_RESEARCH/AUDIENCE.md25 to 80, every consequence as a number · 11 sep 17:48site/01_RESEARCH/DOCTOR_LANDING_STUDY.md16 pages off the DOM · 12 sep 09:25site/02_STRUCTURE/QUESTION_ASSET_MAP.mdquestion to asset, MISSING flagged · 12 sep 18:09your call
Nothing is waiting on you here. When this task puts options in front of you they appear on this page, rendered, and on the canvas where your pick is written back the moment you make it.
os/kit/study.py, 13 sep 2026 10:43. A file marked changed since was modified after the hand that read it wrote its output: that is arithmetic off the real timestamps on disk, not a judgement.